1. The nature of the offer has changed but the
marketer chooses to retain the creative package. Same creative style, same
package, new offer.
2. The new package goes through an A/B test
compared to the existing Control. The winner is the new Control.
3. The marketer chooses to make changes but does
not test against it.
In the case of this self-mailer I received from Chase, it
appears that approach #2 or #3 applied -- with some notable changes compared to
the solicitation package I received from Chase last summer:
· The lead offer is communicated as "earn
50,000 bonus miles" instead of "earn up to 65,000 bonus miles." Both
of the packages have basically the same offer -- 50,000 miles for card
activation, 5,000 miles for adding an authorized user, and 10,000 miles when
spending $25,000 in a year. However, while the older package cited a potential
benefit, the new package has a headline that cites a solid benefit. A solid
benefit in stronger language is an improvement.
Think about this in the concept of a human interaction. Let's say I offer you "up to $650 for an hour of your time." You hear the phrase "up to" and immediately question the value of the offer. Is it really $650? However, if I offer you "$500 for an hour of your time" with a potential bonus of an additional $150, that sounds like a solid offer with an upside potential.
Think about this in the concept of a human interaction. Let's say I offer you "up to $650 for an hour of your time." You hear the phrase "up to" and immediately question the value of the offer. Is it really $650? However, if I offer you "$500 for an hour of your time" with a potential bonus of an additional $150, that sounds like a solid offer with an upside potential.
· The subhead teaser on the address panel
communicates more benefits more simply. The older package's teaser mentioned
only bonus miles, first-year annual fee waiver, and priority boarding. The new
package's teaser mentions the bonus miles. It mentions the first-year annual
fee waiver, but does not quantify the benefit. That is good because the mention
of the $95 cost of the card before a customer actively considers the product
can be daunting. In addition to priority boarding, it mentions United Club
passes. The teaser sensibly does not quantify the benefit of the passes because
the statement is there just to tease. The prospective customer can open the
self-mailer to learn that he or she will receive two passes a year.
· The inside flap copy was modified. The personalized
introduction statement is on the left side while the quantification of
potential miles benefits is on the right. The potential miles explanation is
not integrated with an update of the reader's current United MileagePlus
balance. This smartly allows the reader to focus on the specific aspirational
benefits of the card rather than my account.
· The person holding the card is younger,
clean-cut, and not as explicitly African-American.
When I noticed this last significant
difference, I took a look at the landing page. The person holding the card no
longer looks like a young Jeff Goldblum. He is now is a she, and she looks like
Katee Sackhoff.
On
the whole, the package I received is an improvement from the summer
package. Perhaps Chase learned to
continue to refine the Control package.
No comments:
Post a Comment