My brother is about a year and a half younger than me. To say we were competitive as children would be an understatement. I was reminded of that sibling rivalry when I received similar holiday card solicitations from Shutterfly and Snapfish on the same day in mid-October.
![]() |
| Snapfish Envelope |
![]() |
Both solicitations appear as holiday cards on the outside.
Both display their company names on the reverse flap with a return address in Eden Prairie, MN. Inside the envelope, the holiday card appearance continues,
but with a communication of a discount if we order our holiday cards with them
this season. Great discount if we order by 12/13/26 -- even better discount if
we order by 11/22/26! Save more. Buy now!
Neither of these are Fails per se. In recent years, my wife
and I have ordered our holiday cards from both Snapfish and Shutterfly, so
these are properly targeted reminder mailers. Still, the direct mail geek in me started to
wonder: Was it a coincidence that they arrived at the same time? Turns out, it
likely wasn't.
About seven years ago, Apollo Global Management bought
Shutterfly. A few months later, Shutterfly bought Snapfish. Today, Apollo
operates one company with two separate brands, websites, and pricing. So, they're
in the same family -- you know, like competitive brothers. My speculation is
that the two brands have some similar processes and best practices, such as
mailing solicitations to repeat customers before the leaves turn red and yellow in the
fall. That's why both mailers arrived at the same time.
Why am I bringing all this up? Do either of these mailers
qualify as "Mail That Fails"? Well, not for or Targeting or
Offer. Maybe for Timing? Would it make sense if the two brands mailed at
slightly different times? I'm not so sure. From a production standpoint, maybe that
would even at bit costly. Both pieces appear to be the same weight and
both pieces were mailed Standard Rate. Commingling mail in this manner leads to economies
of scale, high postal saturation, faster delivery, and reduced postage per
piece.
![]() |
| Snapfish's Postage Indicia |
Adding all of that information was unnecessary and, for Snapfish, it creates a bit of a distraction. The USPS requires either the name of the company or the permit number. It is pretty common to have a postage indicia be from a location different from the return address; however, it is pretty rare to have a postage indicia mention the name of a different company. For both mailers, I'd suggest the indicia read simply, "PHOENIX, AZ 85026 / PERMIT NO. 1370."
Happy Holidays!
Lesson: Your postage indicia shares information about you. Either make sure it aligns with your brand or keep it generic.






















.png)
.png)


.png)
.png)

